Interesting video, but the solution is already available for many of us. The iPhone 4 has much more storage than the flip, and you can also plug in directly into the same camera connection kit and import to iPad/iMovie with no conversion.
If Apple released that iPad and it didn't work with the iPhone that would really be something wouldn't it? As such I didn't feel it deserved a comment since it is beyond obvious.
Also, why do conversions of different video formats on the iPad just to say it was all done on a post PC device? Most of us have powerful desktop computers that will make the conversions easy, about 20 times faster, and with free apps. You still have to do the conversion, no steps are saved, and converting in Reeldirector is painfully slow.
1. The iPad is marketed to people as a "Post-PC" device. Not a
"Use this to consume data and buy things" device. I produce content and like to De-Clutter my device chain to get that content out at the highest quality possible... I see no better reason than that, but I can go on.
2. I spend time outdoors away from PCs and Laptops.
3. I spend time in Hotels and if the iPad can't do this, then I would leave it at home and take my i7 Laptop. Which then makes the iPad redundant.
I guess the flip is a nice option if you don't have an iPhone 4 which is an awesome HD camera when used with one of the apps that gives you total manual white balance, focus, and exposure.
I totally agree that the iPhone has a great camera and works with the iPad 2.
Do me a favor though and answer me this question. Why are you begrudging to a person trying to get more functionality out of an expensive device? Please understand that I get why Apple is restrictive on what can work with what and when, but that should not stop the consumer from trying to get what they can to make the device work for them.
I hear the same comment alot from others (many on this forum). Like I shouldn't expect to get the most for my money.