peled said:
Here is a nice scenario:
Police is holding a suspect for rape.
He is being asked if at any time he was visiting the town XXX at the neighborhood YYY.
He deny it.
The police is taking his iPhone and proves him wrong.
Now the investigation gains a point.
You see this on Miami vice or something lol, since when do law enforcement have the right to decide what to search for, maybe in nazi germany but not in the usa, police need search warrants authorized by a district attorney, only on T V do some seem to think that even P I s get a badge and forever work for themselves, there are lawyers, state department and other factors involved to prosecute someone for serious crimes., if the preceding is not correct and evidence used against someone is false the officers, lawyers and other state controlled enforcement agents can be fined, even have to return to take a course to get their licenses back.
Also remember google was sued for using the device Ids of europeens users to exploit information and Internet, they basically got way by faking the device I'd, how would you like I someone used your device ID, raped someone and the cops see your ID in the victims emails, location and all, yet you where home like it's 1984 claiming you have nothing to hide, this is what law enforcement agents are concerned about with device Ids, apple is been sued by law firms not a few fat joes who are upset someone knows where they went to pay for sex.
.
Sent from my iPad2 64GB wifi 3G using iPF