Welcome to iPadForums.net Guest - Click Here to Register
iPadForums.net is the original Apple iPad Forum! Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By f4780y

Thread: Salgado

  1. #1
    iPF Noob
    Member #
    243460
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Poole Dorset England
    Posts
    1

    Thumbs up Salgado

    What free antivirus available for IPad

  2. Ads


  3. #2
    Super Moderator
    Member #
    13576
    Liked
    803 times
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Western NY state (USA)
    Posts
    9,447

    Salgado

    As of today - there is no known virus for the iPad. So, you don't need any sort of virus protection for it.

    And - keep your fingers crossed this remains true for a long, long, time!

    Marilyn
    64GB WiFi/4G iPad3 (iOS 6.1.2; jailbroken w/evasi0n) & Black 32GB iPhone 5 (iOS 6.1.2, jailbroken w/evasi0n)
    * * * PLEASE READ * * * Forum Rules * * * Hacking Section Rules * * * PLEASE READ * * *

  4. #3
    iPad Fan
    Member #
    16407
    Liked
    4 times
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Eastern UK
    Posts
    141
    Your best antivirus is the actual operating system because IOS is virus free.

    If your iPad is Jailboken then this could - repeat - could open it up for possible virus infection from "other" apps
    At my age it can be difficult to understand what others regard as simple!

  5. #4
    Super Moderator
    Member #
    14571
    Liked
    603 times
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Troon, Scotland
    Posts
    7,059
    Quote Originally Posted by ziffos View Post
    Your best antivirus is the actual operating system because IOS is virus free.

    If your iPad is Jailboken then this could - repeat - could open it up for possible virus infection from "other" apps
    But again to be clear, there are NO known jailbreak apps with any infectious payload in the wild. The community simply would not tollerate them and would provide immunisation to all jailbreakers as soon as a potential threat was identified...
    15" MacBookPro with Retina Display 16GB 3.4GHz i7 256GB | iPad4 WiFi 32GB 6.1.2 (evasi0n) | iPad3 4G 64GB 6.1.2 (evasi0n) | iPad2 3G 64GB 5.1.1 (redsn0w) | iPad1 3G 64GB 4.3.3 (jbme) |
    iPhone5 32GB 6.1.2 (evasi0n) | iPhone4S 64GB 5.1.1 (absinthe) | iPhone4 32GB 7.0b (stock) | iPhone3G 16GB 3.1.3 (jbme) | iPod Classic 6G 160GB (stock) | AppleTV 2G 5.0.2 (seas0npass)


    Please review the hacking section rules and our main rules before posting!

  6. #5
    iPad Fan
    Member #
    16407
    Liked
    4 times
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Eastern UK
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by f4780y View Post
    But again to be clear, there are NO known jailbreak apps with any infectious payload in the wild. The community simply would not tollerate them and would provide immunisation to all jailbreakers as soon as a potential threat was identified...
    I agree but whereas IOS is "protection" BEFORE the event, Jailbroken apps protection is AFTER the event.
    At my age it can be difficult to understand what others regard as simple!

  7. #6
    Super Moderator
    Member #
    14571
    Liked
    603 times
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Troon, Scotland
    Posts
    7,059

    Salgado

    Quote Originally Posted by ziffos View Post
    I agree but whereas IOS is "protection" BEFORE the event, Jailbroken apps protection is AFTER the event.
    I too agree , but it's not an absolute truth to say that all IOS protection is before the event. Significant known exploitable code exists in all current versions of stock IOS (5.1.1), and many previous ones too. These are the very same userland exploits which are used to jailbreak the device. They could equally well be used by any malicious code writer since all the exploits are freely available and fully documented in the public domain. I'm not saying those exploits would be easy to use maliciously, but I can conceive of scenarios where it is possible.

    Similarly, malicious jailbreak apps (not that any exist to my knowledge) are / would be difficult to get into the public domain to a large number of owners. There is probably just as much chance of a malicious app store app getting through the Apple approval process, and that is a far more enticing target for a truly malicious h4x0r.

    There is no right or wrong answer in this debate, but I do always push back against the misguided generalisation that jailbreaking IOS somehow makes it significantly more likely that a user is exposed to viruses or malicious attacks by default... there is simply no evidence to support it, and I've been passionately jailbreaking Apple devices for over 5 years now. During that time there have been, if I recall correctly, just 2 potential "virus like" threats to IOS, one specific to jailbreaking which was never anything more than a proof of concept, and another which was valid to both stock and jailbroken devices (using the Safari PDF font exploit). But no malicious code was ever discovered in the public domain relating to either of these as far as I can remember, and the jailbreak community patched the second exploit in less than 24 hours, with Apple following suit on stock devices another 24 hours later
    Yes, if jailbreakers do silly things like enable SSH, fail to change the password from the default, connect to a public wifi network with an unsecured router, and have the very bad luck to encounter a malicious user on the same network who is specifically looking for folks like them, then potentially they could get into trouble. But that same malicious user is probably doing much more interesting malicious things on the network like trying to intercept unsecured data from EVERYONE on the network, rather than looking for a careless iDevice jailbreaker

    With a little bit of care, common sense, and research, both stock and jailbroken iDevice owners should be equally secure in my own humble opinion
    skimonkey likes this.
    15" MacBookPro with Retina Display 16GB 3.4GHz i7 256GB | iPad4 WiFi 32GB 6.1.2 (evasi0n) | iPad3 4G 64GB 6.1.2 (evasi0n) | iPad2 3G 64GB 5.1.1 (redsn0w) | iPad1 3G 64GB 4.3.3 (jbme) |
    iPhone5 32GB 6.1.2 (evasi0n) | iPhone4S 64GB 5.1.1 (absinthe) | iPhone4 32GB 7.0b (stock) | iPhone3G 16GB 3.1.3 (jbme) | iPod Classic 6G 160GB (stock) | AppleTV 2G 5.0.2 (seas0npass)


    Please review the hacking section rules and our main rules before posting!

  8. #7
    iPad Fan
    Member #
    16407
    Liked
    4 times
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Eastern UK
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by f4780y View Post
    I too agree , but it's not an absolute truth to say that all IOS protection is before the event. Significant known exploitable code exists in all current versions of stock IOS (5.1.1), and many previous ones too. These are the very same userland exploits which are used to jailbreak the device. They could equally well be used by any malicious code writer since all the exploits are freely available and fully documented in the public domain. I'm not saying those exploits would be easy to use maliciously, but I can conceive of scenarios where it is possible.



    Similarly, malicious jailbreak apps (not that any exist to my knowledge) are / would be difficult to get into the public domain to a large number of owners. There is probably just as much chance of a malicious app store app getting through the Apple approval process, and that is a far more enticing target for a truly malicious h4x0r.

    There is no right or wrong answer in this debate, but I do always push back against the misguided generalisation that jailbreaking IOS somehow makes it significantly more likely that a user is exposed to viruses or malicious attacks by default... there is simply no evidence to support it, and I've been passionately jailbreaking Apple devices for over 5 years now. During that time there have been, if I recall correctly, just 2 potential "virus like" threats to IOS, one specific to jailbreaking which was never anything more than a proof of concept, and another which was valid to both stock and jailbroken devices (using the Safari PDF font exploit). But no malicious code was ever discovered in the public domain relating to either of these as far as I can remember, and the jailbreak community patched the second exploit in less than 24 hours, with Apple following suit on stock devices another 24 hours later
    Yes, if jailbreakers do silly things like enable SSH, fail to change the password from the default, connect to a public wifi network with an unsecured router, and have the very bad luck to encounter a malicious user on the same network who is specifically looking for folks like them, then potentially they could get into trouble. But that same malicious user is probably doing much more interesting malicious things on the network like trying to intercept unsecured data from EVERYONE on the network, rather than looking for a careless iDevice jailbreaker

    With a little bit of care, common sense, and research, both stock and jailbroken iDevice owners should be equally secure in my own humble opinion

    Couldn't have said it better myself - and didn't lol.
    At my age it can be difficult to understand what others regard as simple!


Advertisements

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search tags for this page

ipad virus protection

,
ziffos
Click on a term to search for related topics.