1. Due to the recent site upgrade, the iPadForums (iPF) App will no longer work. The new iPadForums.net website has been designed from the ground up to work perfectly from any mobile, tablet, or desktop computer using the built in internet browser. Create a shortcut to iPadForums.net on your home screen by following these steps: Create an icon for iPadForums.net

Obama May Have Had a Legitimate Reason to Step in and Reverse the Apple Import Ban

Discussion in 'Apple iPad News' started by dgstorm, Aug 5, 2013.

  1. dgstorm
    Offline

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2011
    Messages:
    299
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +60 / 0
    [​IMG]

    Over the weekend, the big news in the mobile world was that President Obama stepped in and over-turned the ITCs import ban on several Apple products. Previously, Samsung had won a victory over Apple in the ITC showing that Apple had infringed upon some of its patents. This resulted in an import ban on the iPhone 4 and the iPad 2, and would have meant that Apple could no longer sell these devices in the USA.

    This was a big victory for Samsung, and the deadline for Apple to either fix the infringement or face the final import ban had come. At the last second President Obama reversed the ruling, and while this is not the forum to debate the politics of his action, several industry analysts have pointed out that he actually had a valid reason to do so.

    As it turns out, when the ITC commission finally ruled, they were not in full agreement. One ITC commissioner, Dean Pinkert, made the assertion that the infringed patents in question were actually standards essential FRAND (fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory). He also asserted that Samsung didn't handle these patents fairly with Apple, thus his colleagues at the ITC shouldn't have issued the import ban.

    There are several reasons why this matters, and here is a quote below with the details,

    As you can see, the facts of the matter make the picture a bit clearer. Of course, it's possible that behind the scenes all of this was motivated by money and power, which is most often the case in politics. Regardless, it seems like the right thing was likely done in the end.

    Lately, there are many scholars including technical experts, judges and economists, who have called for the end of software patents. They make the valid argument that software patents only slow innovation rather than protect it. What do you think? Does the patent system need an overhaul?

    Source: BGR
    • Like Like x 2
  2. Brontesmith
    Offline

    Brontesmith iPF Novice

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2013
    Messages:
    28
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    why not ... i am in full support .. as consider a scenario where a specific patent has been issued to any particular invention but what for other ones who may make it more updated and upgraded by using the same concept used before .. this is a big drawback of the patent system ... as far as the imitation and protection of a creation is concerned there must be searched for other scenarios capable to put a check upon an infringement of any sort..
  3. s2mikey
    Offline

    s2mikey iPad Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,339
    Thanks Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Upstate, NY
    Ratings:
    +125 / 0
    Apple would have tried the same thing if the situation were reversed. I mean, they sued over the shape of a phone. Like they patented a geometric figure or whatever. Just nutty. It's like, just go make good products and stop worrying about every little thing, would ya? Geesh.

Share This Page