Jury awards Apple more than $1B, finds Samsung infringed

Discussion in 'iPad General Discussions' started by AQ_OC, Aug 24, 2012.

  1. AQ_OC

    AQ_OC
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Wizard

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    6,411
    Thanks Received:
    431
    koh_reads_verdict_610x459.png

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57500159-37/jury-awards-apple-more-than-$1b-finds-samsung-infringed/
     
  2. biobunny

    biobunny
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Junkie

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Messages:
    911
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Before people might storm in with rage for either side, be nice to other members.

    Sent from K48
     
  3. ipadsi

    ipadsi
    Expand Collapse
    iPF Novice

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    12
    Thanks Received:
    3
    This could only happen in America, the world leaders in suing people. As a user of both an Android phone and an iPad 3, I am gutted by the result. It has shown how pathetic Apple have become and it is clear they feel threatened by Samsung. The competition between Apple and Samsung was a positive thing, ensuring that both companies make bigger and better products. As much as I love my iPad I really hope this result back fires on Apple.
     
  4. evohicks

    evohicks
    Expand Collapse
    iPF Novice

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2011
    Messages:
    58
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Yep I agree, close competition is what we need and I don't like the way Apple sues anyone that comes close to their design.
    I also have an Android phone and the iPad 2 and my Galaxy S2 phone has been brilliant, I would not hesitate to buy phones from Samsung but while Apple phones are very good products they are also very restricted by Apple and I think these sort of court cases can only damage their reputation. Just think of the guys that would miss out on some of the best phones in the world if Apple follows up with its threats to ban imports/sales.
     
  5. thewitt

    thewitt
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Ninja

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,634
    Thanks Received:
    72
    Samsung blatantly copied Apple's patented designs in order to get a phone to market quickly. The court and jury found them guilty and they have to pay $1B in restitution.

    Patents on original design are protected under the US Constitution.

    Everything worked exactly as it was supposed to in this case.
     
  6. Hayles66

    Hayles66
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Messages:
    8,915
    Thanks Received:
    371
    If you were the person who created these devices and someone copied your design but by cutting out the designers fee, then yes, of course they would be cheaper to manufacture. Apple have to pay for innovation and design, why can't Samsung do the same. It will harm customers choice but that is Samsung's fault for copying other people's ideas and saying they did it first. Why couldn't Samsung just come up with their own ideas and everyone can make their own choice. I've had Samsung devices before but for me, Apple devices are near perfect.

    Sent from my new iPad using iPF
     
  7. ipadsi

    ipadsi
    Expand Collapse
    iPF Novice

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    12
    Thanks Received:
    3

    The court was complete farce in the first place being held in California. Of course an American Jury and Judge were going to find a South Korean company guilty. I bet every single one owns an iPhone. The thing I find ironic is that Samsung provide screens and chips to Apple!

    Shame on you America and Apple.
     
  8. zorah

    zorah
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Junkie

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Messages:
    506
    Thanks Received:
    6
    Both have billions upon billions in revenue. Samsung makes as we know, numerous electronic products, cameras, etc. Android phones/tablets ets are just one part. Apple we know makes billions.
    I read the article and in an of itself, copyright infringement is what it is, and any other product out there would have the original maker doing same.
    I do think healthy competition of course just incites each to make a better product. And fact is, there are loads of people who will never buy an iPhone because they don't like Apple.
    I have no issue with Android, and find the phones pretty cool, but I would never own one because I like my iPhone. So many of us aren't swayed and lured away to a Samsung phone. And I can tell the difference between them. Also, cost-wise, I know what the latest iPhone model runs. Are the Samsungs in a comparable price range? I would assume so, therefore the consumer is not swayed by cost difference, so most that can pick an iPhone might, but many then surely don't because perhaps they just plain don't want an iPhone.
     
  9. AQ_OC

    AQ_OC
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Wizard

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    6,411
    Thanks Received:
    431
    Totally unfair. Lots of people own non-apple phones and certainly lots of people own Samsung electronics in America. And both companies do business in America. Finally, Samsung is a big company, the part that sells memory and screens is not necessary the same part that makes phones and sells them.
     
  10. AQ_OC

    AQ_OC
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Wizard

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    6,411
    Thanks Received:
    431
    South Korean court finds both Apple and Samsung guilty of patent infringement

    South Korean court finds both Apple and Samsung guilty of patent infringement
     

Share This Page