Here Comes the Competition

Discussion in 'iPad General Discussions' started by DUTCH VanAtlanta, Sep 27, 2010.

  1. DUTCH VanAtlanta

    DUTCH VanAtlanta iPF Novice

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    96
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA USA
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2010
  2. wrecklass

    wrecklass iPad Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    387
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Denver
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    Well at least the original rumors about the name of the device were wrong.

    I don't think they are going to attract any big developers to the platform. Right now everyone is betting on Apple or Google. Microsoft and RIM (Blackberry) will be competing for third place.
     
  3. Sonny Burnett

    Sonny Burnett iPad Junkie

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    752
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0
    All other competitors have problems.

    Microsoft - Windows is too power hungry to run on today's tablet CPUs

    Android - There will be too many tablets running this OS, what is going to distinguish one from the other?

    RIM - ???

    HP- While the Web OS is a true competitor to iOS the device it lacks a diverse eco system.
     
  4. IGonz

    IGonz iPad Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    108
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    Here we go again.
    Another tablet maker leaving out the battery life info in the specs.
    I did find that it's removable.

    The iPad had the battery info in the specs before it even came out.
    I'm spoiled with this 10-12 hour battery.
    Battery life is usually the first thing I look for in the specs. with any portable device.
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2010
  5. Alanfujii

    Alanfujii iPF Novice

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Messages:
    59
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Newport Beach, CA
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    I'm still convinced that what people are going to find is that the 7inch screen is too small. if you have an iPhone it's not that much different. One thing that I find interesting with the Blackberry ads is that they start off showing a different sized tablet. I think it might be their "Blackpad" that is more scaled to the iPad. The subsequent slides then show a more rectangular unit which is probably the Playbook. They seemed to shy away from showing a full web site display since I know it will not be able to.
    There will be some people that will want that size but it will be awkward since they will want it to do more of the functions a phone will do. Samsung was faced with that problem so they put phone features in their Tab. The problem is it isn't a phone and if you try to use it as a phone it will fail. The iPad's size provides enough separation from their iPhone. If Apple is smart they will keep it that way for example. If they put a camera in iPad then there is only need for a front facing camera that will allow their Facetime to work. An outward facing camera will be hampered by they usability in trying to take pictures holding a picture frame sized device.
     
  6. iVan

    iVan iPad Ninja

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,929
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Near Montréal Québec
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0
    What companies will do to garner interest in their stock.

    Was this an attempt to prevent people from going Apple's way? Is there substance behind those fabricated images?

    At least Apple has the right recipe. Develop a product under the highest secrecy possible, schedule an event and show the full product with a delivery date... so what if it's late...:p
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2010
  7. wrecklass

    wrecklass iPad Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    387
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Denver
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    Actually for many people the big benefit to Android is the fact that there are numerous vendors and lots of choices.

    The situation is almost exactly the same as the OS desktop wars of the 80's and 90's. Apple is once again playing the part of their OS on their hardware with limited, but quality choices.

    Google is now the Microsoft of the mobile world. Lots of hardware choices and they are drawing lots of developers to the platform. What's more, they are upgrading the system at a very rapid pace and have already caught up with Apple for market share.

    I suspect we are going to see the same shakeout. This time it will be Google as the number 1, Apple happily in number 2 with those who love their top notch user experience, and MS, HP, RIM, and the rest vying for the remainder of the market.
     
  8. DUTCH VanAtlanta

    DUTCH VanAtlanta iPF Novice

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    96
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA USA
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    HP and MS have dropped their plans for a tablet.
     
  9. MattIM

    MattIM Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,230
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Ratings:
    +53 / 0
    HP recently bought Palm

    So it would be a bad investment on HP's part to abandon plans for their own tablet. I was hoping to see what HP could do with a tablet. HP via Compaq, was an innovator in mobile computing. They were one of the first PC companies to offer portable computing.
     
  10. donka

    donka iPad Junkie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Messages:
    795
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Scotland
    Ratings:
    +27 / 0

    I believe HP have only dropped their plans for a Windows powered tablet.
     
  11. pallentx

    pallentx iPad Junkie

    Joined:
    May 28, 2010
    Messages:
    663
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0
    actually, more recently, they have denied dropping those plans. The last thing I saw, they were still planning a WebOS consumer-oriented tablet and a Windows 7 Enterprise/business-oriented tablet.
     
  12. Alanfujii

    Alanfujii iPF Novice

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Messages:
    59
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Newport Beach, CA
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    I agree Wrecklass that multiple vendors will provide a long term benefit because competition is always good for the consumer. The problem that I predict will happen in these early stages of this new platform is that the multitude of various companies producing "me too" tablets is that it will cause confusion in the marketplace. One potential problem for Android systems is the need for companies to differentiate themselves will cause them to develop proprietary features that will hurt the evolution of the OS. I'm not familiar with the android phones but I use the Windows mobile as a model. What initially was a very powerful OS became hampered by trying to spread it's use over various hardware platforms that it became very generic. Your going to have a lot of misses before there becomes some stability. Hopefully, the platform doesn't get ruined in the process. (I.e. UMPC etc)
     
  13. wrecklass

    wrecklass iPad Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    387
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Denver
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    I don't believe it will. HTC Sense and stock Android UI are becoming the defacto standard. Most of the cheap devices rely on the stock interface which is quite good. Sense is also very good.

    Android 3 (Gingerbread) will be all about improving the standard UI. I think that while some of the devices will be crap, just like some PCs are, the consumer choices available will make the platform thrive.
     
  14. Wakawaka

    Wakawaka iPad Junkie

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    550
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0
    I'm up for some healthy competition.

    Think about it, when ford came out with their first vehicle, flat black pickup that's all there was. Now you have thousands of vehicle choices to fit the needs of buyers. I need an suv for my dog. My girl needs a car for mpg to get to work.

    Same with cellphones. Remember them brick phones? Then nokias. Now choice. I got the iPhone because I'm an office guy. My construction crew can't have an iPhone because it won't last. But drop their nextel 5 stories and "beepbeep" it still works.

    I'm not going to degrade another companies effort to get into the market with their product. If I like it, and it fits my needs I'll buy it. I'd rather have choices than one solution.

    I picked the iPad over the tablet pc because of size an battery power. I gave up memory and freedom for size, battery, and simplicity.

    The blackberry does look good though. I'm sure a little better and virus free from the hp slate
     

Share This Page