Apple being sued for price fixing

Discussion in 'iPad General Discussions' started by exile, Apr 11, 2012.

  1. exile

    exile
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    334
    Thanks Received:
    15
    This is one of the dozens of articles that's out there right now. U.S fed.govt and 15 states suing Apple and other publishers for ebook price fixing. What do you think?

    Link to USA today's news article


    "Rutro..." - Scooby
     
  2. Skull One

    Skull One
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Junkie

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    612
    Thanks Received:
    78
    I can't wait for Apple to lose.
     
  3. wholesalestunna

    wholesalestunna
    Expand Collapse
    iPF Novice

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2012
    Messages:
    42
    Thanks Received:
    0
    I can't wait to see the outcome of this suit. I think the ebook prices are ridiculous. There's no way that an ebook can cost the same or more than a hardback version. They don't have to print it, use paper, ship them, or pay employees. They make a killing off them at $16 a pop.
     
  4. Seadog

    Seadog
    Expand Collapse
    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,522
    Thanks Received:
    52
    The problem is not Apple, but the publishers. In order to get the publishers on board, Apple had to put together a pricing plan that they would agree to. Even so, the ebook pricing was contentuous. And if the standardized price for ebooks is price fixing, then what about the music pricing? This really sounds like politics more than anything else.
     
  5. beesknees

    beesknees
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Fan

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    229
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Right. Apple and the publishers are not on the same level. This would make more sense if Apple, Amazon, and B&N were conspiring to price fix.
     
  6. Skull One

    Skull One
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Junkie

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    612
    Thanks Received:
    78
    Actually Apple is at fault. Apples's contract states that the publisher can not sell their ebook for a lower price than what is set on iTunes. That is 100% price fixing. The reason the publisher were sued was because they agreed to the contract and then enforced it throughout their business model. Which was in their best interest due to the higher profit margins. Which means they reach the level of collusion.

    Apple is going to lose. It is simply now a matter of how much.
     
  7. beesknees

    beesknees
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Fan

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    229
    Thanks Received:
    5

    I disagree. Apple may have asked for it but all the publishers had to do was say no. It hurts Apple more than the publishers if they don't have a contract because in this business content is king. If Amazon routinely has the selection you are looking for and Apple doesn't you will eventually stop trying to buy from Apple.
     
  8. Skull One

    Skull One
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Junkie

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    612
    Thanks Received:
    78
    You may disagree, but that doesn't change the facts of the issue or the laws that were broken.

    The publishers didn't say no. Which is why it reached the level of collusion. And the reason they didn't say no? It allowed them to make higher profit margin based on the market reach Apple already had in hand.

    BTW, there are publisher that did say no. They are not being sued.
     
  9. beesknees

    beesknees
    Expand Collapse
    iPad Fan

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    229
    Thanks Received:
    5
    The distinction is that Apple didn't set the prices, the publishers did. At worst Apple is an accessory and I don't even know how that works with a corporation.

    Apple asked them to break the law. They chose to do it.
     
  10. Seadog

    Seadog
    Expand Collapse
    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,522
    Thanks Received:
    52
    The reason the publishers demanded the agency model was because Amazon was undercutting everyone else. To monopolize the market, Amazon would sell books below costs. Their plan was to run everyone else out of business, to be honest. You do not see Barnes and Noble, or any other bookstore in very good shape right now. Amazon has cut them off at the knees. Once they had the publishers having to deal with Amazon for the vast majority of sales, Amazon could dictate what price the publishers sold books to them. There are laws against this practice in some states, because it is unfair commerce.

    The problem is that the publishers have been making obscene profits off books for so long that they do not want to lose their money. Amazon was making things where the publishers would have to bow to them to sell books. So one dictatorship was replacing another. Apple's compact was a compromise that allowed a consistent book pricing without giving one vendor absolute control.
     

Share This Page



Search tags for this page
apple bein sued by government
,

apple being sued by government

,
give me a real life examples today of price fixing
,
real life common examples price fixing
,

real life example of price fixing

,
real life price fixing situations